#1748392: Under Pressure: The 2026 Exposure Gap
| Description: |
Fewer than one in ten vulnerability alerts warranted Critical or High attention once we tested whether they were actually exploitable. Severity tells you how bad a finding would be. It does not tell you whether it can happen in your environment. That gap is why remediation capacity keeps growing while risk stays flat. Join Check Point Exposure Management live as Danny Miller unpacks the 2026 Exposure Gap Report and argues the constraint was never capacity but triage accuracy. We look at how the exposure queue shifted this year, why brand and phishing exposure stopped being someone else's problem, and what changes when a finding arrives proven rather than scored. Agentic Exposure Validation reasons like an attacker and captures the evidence, including a live phishing kit caught mid-campaign. You will leave with a defensible way to separate the urgent work from the rest, language for the board on why most of the queue is not an emergency, and proof that the fastest programs in the study were also the busiest. |
|---|---|
| More info: | https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/20101/673348 |
| Date added | Aug. 4, 2026, 7:08 p.m. |
|---|---|
| Source | Bright Talk |
| Subjects | |
| Venue | Aug. 13, 2026, midnight - Aug. 13, 2026, midnight |
